Turning landlords into border guards does lead to discrimination – just as we warned

28th March 2017 / UK Civil Liberties and Rights Newscast
Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditDigg this

By Rosie Brighouse Liberty-human-rights.org.uk:  Liberty warned from the outset that the Government’s misguided ‘right to rent’ scheme would sow discrimination and division – and today a landmark report from the Joint Council for the Welfare of Immigrants (JCWI) reveals that’s exactly what it’s done.

For years, successive governments have been on a mission to make border guards of all of us.

They’ve roped in bank clerks, doctors, teachers, police and employers to check the immigration status of their customers, patients, school pupils, citizens and staff.

And the tentacles with of this obsession have also reached into the housing market.

Get Briefed, Get Weekly Intelligence Reports - Essential Weekend Reading - Safe Subscribe

Since last year, landlords have been compelled to demand proof of the immigration status of prospective tenants under the Government’s ‘right to rent’ scheme, under threat of enormous fines or even a prison sentence.

No passport, no home

Ever since the idea first reared its ugly head, campaigners, MPs and even landlords themselves warned it would lead to discrimination – with no real enforcement benefits for the Home Office.

With the threat of imprisonment hanging over anyone who lets a home to an illegal immigrant, landlords were bound to opt for tenants who look and sound “British”.

With the scheme now in full swing across England, JCWI embarked on a research project, conducting surveys and mystery shopping exercises to gauge the impact it’s having on our communities.

And, unfortunately, it looks like our concerns were well founded.

Creating prejudices

Among their most shocking findings was that certain British people are among the worst-affected groups. Compared with Brits with passports, black and minority ethnic (BME) UK citizens without them were:

  • 26 per cent more likely to be rejected or ignored by landlords
  • 25 per cent less likely to be offered a viewing
  • 20 per cent less likely to be told the property is available

White British people without passports were 11 per cent more likely to receive a negative response than those with passports.

Significantly, the JCWI found no evidence of racial discrimination between BME and white Brits who did have passports. This isn’t about landlords harbouring personal prejudices – it’s the result of clumsy, discriminatory government law-making.

Dividing communities

The Government claims it’s creating a ‘hostile environment’ for illegal immigrants – but, in building a border on every street, they’re dividing whole communities and making life more difficult for us all. British citizens are being denied a place to live in the towns they grew up in.

But, predictably, foreign nationals have been hit hardest. Even those with indefinite leave to remain in the UK were 20 per cent more likely to be ignored or rejected than British people with passports.

Almost half of landlords surveyed by JCWI said right to rent made them less likely to let a home to anyone without a British passport.

Ineffective

All this – and the scheme isn’t even achieving the results the Government wants.

According to JCWI’s research, less than five per cent of people whose details were passed to the Home Office because of the scheme have been removed from the UK.

We warned ministers from the start that right to rent would damage our communities, embed discrimination in our housing market and do nothing to help the Government deport illegal migrants. Now here it is in black and white.

Ministers can’t keep ignoring cold, hard facts – they must shut down this toxic experiment.

 

Rosie Brighouse joined Liberty in 2013 and has conducted cases relating to a wide range of issues, including the rights of victims of sexual abuse, protest rights in Parliament Square, discrimination in the armed forces and the use of stop and search by the Metropolitan Police.

She also led a number of interventions in the Court of Appeal, Supreme Court and European Court of Human Rights – including in the recent David Miranda case. She leads Liberty’s work challenging Public Spaces Protection Orders, in particular those targeting the homeless.

Rosie is a qualified solicitor and previously studied and worked in areas such as human rights and the criminal justice system, the rights of people in detention and victims’ rights.

 

 

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on TumblrShare on LinkedInPin on PinterestShare on StumbleUponShare on RedditDigg this


The European Financial Review

The European Financial Review is the leading financial intelligence magazine read widely by financial experts and the wider business community.