Budget 2024: Market Over-Reaction?

1st November 2024 / United Kingdom

By Graham Vanbergen: The financial markets displayed a swift and intense reaction to UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves’ budget announcement this week, underscoring the market’s sensitivity to fiscal policy under the Labour Party’s economic vision. Reeves, who presented her budget amid heightened economic challenges, faced market volatility that seemed disproportionate, raising questions about the underlying factors driving such a reaction. While budgets invariably cause shifts in investor sentiment, this particular response appears to have been influenced by deeper concerns about inflation, public debt, and the UK’s economic trajectory.

Rachel Reeves proposed a budget that aims to revitalize the UK economy through strategic public investment, green initiatives, and social welfare reforms. The budget included policies aimed at fostering a sustainable recovery, such as increased funding for infrastructure, green energy projects, and healthcare. She emphasized a responsible approach to public spending, aiming to balance investment with fiscal prudence by gradually reducing debt as a percentage of GDP over the medium term. Yet, despite these assurances, the market’s reaction was swift and steep.

An Overreaction?

Market responses to budgets typically involve adjustments, but this week’s reaction to Reeves’ fiscal policies stood out for its speed if nothing else. Shortly after her announcement, the pound experienced a slight dip against major currencies, bond yields saw an uptick, and equities in sectors vulnerable to taxation or regulation faced downward pressure. This reaction seemed to stem less from any radical policy in the budget and more from market apprehensions about the Labour Party’s longer-term economic approach and the UK’s fiscal health.

Market commentators pointed to several factors as drivers of this reaction, including:

A Fear of Increased Borrowing: Even though Reeves pledged a careful debt management strategy, market participants feared that the proposed investments would lead to elevated borrowing in the short term, particularly with inflation still a concern.

Concerns Over Inflation: Some of Reeves’ spending initiatives, especially those aimed at public services, were perceived by some investors as potentially inflationary. There is ongoing anxiety over whether fiscal support might counteract the Bank of England’s monetary tightening efforts to combat inflation.

Scepticism Towards Green Investment Plans: The green agenda, which featured prominently in Reeves’ budget, was met with mixed reactions. While some investors view green investment as essential to future growth, others worry about the upfront costs and the uncertainty in returns, especially in an era of fluctuating energy prices and supply chain vulnerabilities.

A Pattern of Sensitivity?

The markets have shown a pattern of heightened sensitivity to budget announcements in the UK over recent years, arguably influenced by volatility and global instability post-Brexit. The memory of the market reaction to Liz Truss’s mini-budget last year may still linger, leading investors to react preemptively to any signs of fiscal expansion that might echo past issues.

SafeSubcribe/Instant Unsubscribe - One Email, Every Sunday Morning - So You Miss Nothing - That's It

This reaction, however, seems to lack a rational basis given the relatively moderate nature of Reeves’ policies. Unlike Truss’s unfunded tax cuts, Reeves’ budget contained a mix of targeted spending and revenue-generating initiatives aimed at stabilizing, rather than abruptly shifting, economic policy. This disproportionate response highlights an ongoing trust deficit between the financial markets and the current Labour leadership – a divide rooted in perceptions of fiscal responsibility that may be more ideological than policy-driven.

Beyond policy specifics, market reactions are often shaped by sentiment and speculation. Investors appear to be acting on broader anxieties about the UK’s economic landscape, which has been characterized by high inflation, slowing growth, and labour unrest. With global economic pressures such as high interest rates in the US and sluggish growth in Europe, the market reaction to Reeves’ budget may reflect fears that the UK could struggle to maintain its financial stability amid international economic challenges. After all, there is now very little headroom for any more shocks like a global pandemic, a war on European soil or indeed in the Middle East.

Moreover, political biases may be amplifying these reactions. Labour’s platform of “big government” spending contrasts sharply with Conservative principles of fiscal restraint, which is false given that when the Conservatives were in power, the national debt, i.e. debt to GDP doubled before the pandemic arrived. This ideological clash may have contributed to scepticism among certain investors.

If anything, it reveals a deeper tension between the need for growth and investment and the financial community’s current preoccupation with short-term stability and austerity.

The swift response suggests an overreaction driven more by apprehension and market psychology than by fundamental analysis. Reeves’ budget, while ambitious, offered a balanced approach to public spending and investment, taking care to address debt in a measured manner. Yet, the market’s rapid reaction indicates an underlying mistrust of policies that diverge from austerity or cost-cutting measures, revealing an arguably outdated reliance on conservative fiscal models that may no longer fit the economic demands of a post-pandemic UK.

In the end, a more balanced assessment of Reeves’ budget may reveal that the proposed investments in infrastructure, healthcare, and green technology could have long-term economic benefits, potentially strengthening the UK’s economy and workforce in the face of future challenges.

It should be noted that this market reaction comes in one day. On that same day, debt to GDP in other countries looks much worse. Japan sits at an eyewatering 264 per cent, Greece is 173 per cent, Italy 142, USA 129, France, Spain and Portugal all at 112, Canada 107, and Belgium is at 104 per cent. The UK sits around 98 or 99 per cent, depending on what you read.

This week’s market reaction underscores the challenges that any UK government faces if attempting to implement a growth-oriented fiscal policy without provoking market anxiety. The response to Rachel Reeves’ budget highlights the role of investor sentiment in driving market movements, sometimes independently of the actual fiscal risks involved. The market’s swift reaction will prove to be temporary. If anything, it reveals a deeper tension between the need for growth and investment and the financial community’s current preoccupation with short-term stability and austerity.

For Labour, the reaction to Reeves’ budget could be an important lesson in managing market expectations and building investor confidence, especially as the party continues to define its economic vision. And for investors, the week’s events might serve as a reminder to balance caution with a realistic view of the long-term potential embedded in well-targeted public spending.