Climate Change: What You Ddn’t Know About The New Global Treaty To Rule Them All
A new report from Corporate Europe Observatory and TNI exposes how the little-known Energy Charter Treaty gives corporations the power to obstruct the transition from climate-wrecking fossil fuels towards renewable energy. And how it is being expanded, threatening to bind yet more countries to corporate-friendly energy policies.
Two decades ago, and without significant public debate, an obscure international agreement entered into force, the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT). It acts like the secret magical “One Ring to rule them all” from the Lord of the Rings trilogy, granting corporations enormous powers over our energy systems including the ability to sue governments, which could obstruct the transition from climate-wrecking fossil fuels towards renewable energy. And the ECT is in the process of expansion, threatening to bind yet more countries to corporate-friendly energy policies.
Today the ECT applies to nearly 50 countries stretching from Western Europe through Central Asia to Japan. Among its many provisions, those regarding foreign investments in the energy sector – also known under the infamous acronym ISDS or investor-state dispute settlement – are the ECT’s cornerstone. The ECT’s ISDS provisions give foreign investors in the energy sector sweeping rights to directly sue states in international tribunals of three private lawyers, the arbitrators. Companies can be awarded dizzying sums in compensation for government actions that have allegedly damaged their investments, either directly through ‘expropriation’ or indirectly through regulations of virtually any kind. Energy giant Vattenfall, for example, has sued Germany over environmental restrictions on a coal-fired power plant and for phasing out nuclear power. Oil and gas company Rockhopper is suing Italy over a ban on offshore oil drilling. Several utility companies are pursuing the EU’s poorest member state, Bulgaria, after the government reduced soaring electricity costs for consumers.
Yet the ECT and its profiteers have largely escaped public attention. While the past decade has seen a storm of opposition to ISDS in other international trade and investment deals the ECT has managed to steer surprisingly clear of this public outrage. Many investor lawsuits under the treaty remain secret. For others, there is only scant information available. And in countries in the process of acceding to the ECT, hardly anyone seems to have even heard of the agreement, let alone have thoroughly examined its political, legal, and financial risks.
This report shines a light on the “one ring” of the ECT, which will greatly influence the battle over our future energy systems, as well as the corporations and lawyers, to which it grants enormous powers.
Just some od the key findings from the report are:
SafeSubcribe/Instant Unsubscribe - One Email, Every Sunday Morning - So You Miss Nothing - That's It
- No trade and investment agreement anywhere in the world has triggered more investor-state lawsuits than the ECT
- In recent years the number of ECT investor lawsuits has exploded
- More recently, investors have begun to use the ECT to sue countries in Western Europe
- More and more money is at stake for states and taxpayers
- Corporations claim compensation for loss of ‘future profits’
- Governments have been ordered or agreed to pay more than US$51.2 billion in damages from the public purse
- Investors who have filed lawsuits under the ECT come mostly from Western Europe
- The majority of ECT claims are intra-EU disputes, yet sideline EU courts
- The ECT is prone to abuse by letterbox companies
- The ECT is increasingly being used by speculative financial investors such as portfolio investors and holding companies
- The ECT is a powerful tool in the hands of big oil, gas, and coal companies to discourage governments from transitioning to clean energy
- The ECT can be used to attack governments that aim to reduce energy poverty and make electricity affordable
- A small number of arbitrators dominate ECT decisionmaking
- Five elite law firms have been involved in nearly half of all known ECT investor lawsuits
- There are concerns about self-dealing and institutionalised corruption in institutions that administer ECT disputes
- Polluting companies and for-profit investment lawyers enjoy privileged access to the ECT Secretariat
- Many countries across the world are about to join the ECT, threatening to bind them into corporate-friendly energy policies
- There is an alarming lack of awareness about the ECT’s political and financial risks in the ECT’s potential new signatory states
But there is some good news. Around the world, the tide is turning against ECT-style super-rights for corporations. Campaigners, activists, academics, and parliamentarians are beginning to ask critical questions about the ECT. The agreements and the investor lawsuits it has enabled could also come under legal fire from EU courts. More countries could follow the example of Russia and Italy, which have already turned their back on the Energy Charter Treaty.
This report warns of the dangers of expanding the ECT to an ever-growing number of countries and concludes with eight key reasons for leaving – or not joining – the ECT. Just as in the Lord of the Rings, where the “fellowship” of nine companions around the little hobbit Frodo Baggins manages to destroy the One Ring, a fellowship of citizens, legal scholars, parliamentarians, courts and governments might be in the making, which will eventually break the binding power of the Energy Charter Treaty “ring”.
Read the full report HERE from Corporate Europe Observatory.