Constitutional Affairs Committee Investigates Gov’t Over Cronyism

Editor Comment: Boris Johnson is now on course to have had three ethics advisers and three different Downing Street set-ups in less than three years. It is not possible for any reasonably sane individual to think that this is the best way to run a country. There have now been seven formal investigations into Johnson’s government – the Jennifer Arcuri scandal, the flat refurbishment, ‘partygate‘, Greensill Capital and three others involving bullying, tax dodging and undeclared donor ‘benefits.’ Now we have an inquiry into cronyism, or as I like to call it – corruption. This government is corrupting everything it touches and it is no surprise that yet more precious resources are being focused on attempting to make those in the corridors of power accountable. This story goes to the heart of another big problem rapidly coming into focus – breaches of the ministerial code.

 

By Tevye Markson: The Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee has launched an inquiry into the role and regulation of non-executive directors in government amid concern over “cronyism”.

The inquiry will investigate the trend toward ministers appointing political allies as non-executive directors (NED’s).

PACAC will also examine how conflicts of interest are managed, the lack of independent regulation for both NEDs’ activities and their appointment, and what work it is appropriate for NEDs to undertake.

Non-executives are appointed by secretaries of state to sit on the boards of government departments and challenge departments on their performance and delivery.

“The government point to non-executive directors as an important part of civil service governance, with the ability to wield considerable influence over departmental direction and delivery, yet there is little awareness of what they do,” PACAC chair William Wragg said.

“Several appointments have also raised questions about the appointment process itself and the absence of independent oversight. Our inquiry aims to shed light on the activities of non-executives and consider how they should be held accountable.”

The ministerial code states appointees should be drawn largely from the commercial private sector. But last year the Institute for Government found that 20% of non-executive directors surveyed had political experience.

The inquiry will also look into the lack of transparency about the role and activities of a NED.

The government committed to “make better use of NEDs to challenge performance in their departments and across government” in the Declaration on Government Reform published last June. This included ensuring that every department has a delivery board with NED involvement to monitor performance on Outcome Delivery Plans. However, there is not yet any information available on NEDs’ activities.

The DGR also included plans to review what roles in governance are appropriate for NEDs.

The PACAC review comes amid increased scrutiny of government non-execs. The government was accused of “naked cronyism” by Labour last month for appointing a businessman who had donated more than £700,000 to the Conservatives in the last seven years. Oluwole Kolade was appointed as a non-executive director and deputy chair of NHS England for three years on 31 March.

And last summer Labour called for a crackdown on appointments to departmental boards after it emerged that then-health secretary Matt Hancock had made his aide and lover Gina Coladangelo a Department of Health and Social Care non-exec. Coladangelo was one of 16 NEDs – of a total of around 80 – with close ties to the Conservative Party, the campaign group Open Democracy said at the time.

They included former Conservative and UKIP MP Douglas Carswell and former Conservative vice-chair – and Jacob Rees-Mogg’s business partner – Dominic Johnson, both at the Department for International Trade; and Nick Timothy, former joint chief of staff to former Tory PM Theresa May, at the Department for Education.

Labour’s criticism followed an earlier warning by then-public appointments commissioner Peter Riddell about “growing concerns” over political bias, cronyism and the lack of regulation of NED appointments.

“The original idea of bringing in people with business and similar experience from outside Whitehall has been partly replaced by the appointment of political allies of ministers, in some cases without competition, and without any form of regulatory oversight,” he wrote in a letter to Lord Jonathan Evans, chair of the Committee on Standards in Public Life, in late 2020.

 

 

 

---